History Debate

Why Women's Status Deteriorated

      Despite images of cave men dragging women off by the hair, it is quite clear that hunting and gathering societies did not subordinate women systematically. Women's economic contributions were reflected in a religious culture that often stressed the female creative principle. This situation changed as agriculture be- came established, and the trend occurred everywhere that farming spread. (interestingly, nonagricultural societies, like the herding peoples in Central Asia, continued to give women greater voice, which led to some important culture clashes when they encountered agricultural civilizations.)
      The signs of change abound. Men did the heaviest agricultural work; Middle Eastern art by 3000 B.C.E. showed men always responsible for plowing. Because men's relative economic importance grew, male children were favored and men had primary rights of property ownership. While religions long continued to feature gods and goddesses, emphasis on a primary male creator god, like Marduk in the Middle East or Zeus in Greece, increased; goddesses became more peripheral. The Jewish religion, emphasizing a single god, pushed this principle of a masculine divinity still further. Laws and social habits often followed suit. By 2000 B.C.E., many Middle Eastern women were veiled to help ensure that they would remain sexually faithful to their husbands--who were not placed under any such controls.
      The question, of course, is why this happened. The rise of women's history and new debates about women's rights today open the gender inequality of the past to explanation; it no longer seems self-evident. Current explanations include several components, and it is unlikely that such a basic shift resulted from one factor alone. Agricultural societies, needing to defend from attack and not infrequently seeking to conquer, organized more formal military forces, which gave new emphasis to male power. The birth rate went up, as agricultural societies found uses for more labor and also needed to compensate far higher disease rates; this meant that women spent more of their lives bearing and caring for children. Men may have pushed for greater power to compensate for the decline of the hunt. In the upper classes, at least, establishment of agricultural property made determination of inheritance more important: men wanted to know which children were theirs and so tried to regulate women's sexual behavior. We do not know how these various causes mixed together, but the result is clear. And in most agricultural societies, women's inferiority tended to increase with time, as success prompted more male groups to demonstrate their status by lording over women.


Adapted From:
World History in Brief
Major Patterns of Change and Continuity
Third Edition

Peter N. Stearns

Caregie Mellon University
Longman
An imprint of Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Return to Syllabus