Montgomery County Public Schools, Rockville, Maryland
SEARCH


DEPARTMENT OF STUDENT SERVICES > PROBLEM SOLVING TEAMS
 

School-Based Problem Solving Teams

All MCPS schools have an Educational Management Team (EMT). The purpose of the EMT is to help teachers solve specific instructional, behavioral or motivational problems. Each school maintains their own EMT schedule. The usual practice is for EMT to meet once each week. Members on the EMT vary and are based on the problem being discussed. In most schools, regular EMT membership includes a school administrator, classroom teacher, resource teacher, and the school counselor. School psychologists, pupil personnel workers, speech language pathologists, the student and parents/guardians participate frequently.

Students suspected of an educational disability and seeking accommodative services as provided by section 504 of the vocational amendments began this determination at the EMT level. (Section 504 is a civil rights law. Section 504 prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Section 504 ensures that the child with a disability has equal access to an education. The child may receive accommodations and modifications.)

In an effort to enhance the problem solving supports available to schools the Collaborative Action Process (CAP) format was developed. CAP begins with specific strategic analyses that support school improvement planning and focuses a four-step problem solving process directly on helping staff consider the multiple "factors" that inhibit appropriate behavior and diminish learning and how to improve classroom behavior and enrich learning. At this time, CAP is being implemented in schools on a voluntary basis with approximately 30 schools participating.

The four problem solving steps are:

  1. Problem Identification (during which the following are considered):
    • What does the student know?
    • What do we expect the student to know/do?
    • When, where, and how are problems occurring?
    • What is the student's history of learning and behaving?
  2. Why Problem Analysis (during which the following are considered):
    • Why is this problem occurring?
      • Is it related to student factors?
      • Is it related to curricular/instructional factors?
      • Is it related to teacher, classroom or peer factors?
      • What is the contribution of the home and community?
      • What is maintaining the problem?
  3. Intervention Planning (during which the following are considered):
    • What is the expected behavioral or academic performance level?
    • What strategies will address the reasons we found for the problem?
    • What changes and supports need to be designed in what setting? By whom?
    • What skills, knowledge and resources do we need to make the changes occur?
    • What will we look for as criteria for success?
  4. Monitoring and Evaluation (during which the following are considered):
    • Is the plan being implemented as designed? Why? Why not?
    • What are the challenges?
    • Are we moving toward the criteria for success and seeing evidence of learning?
    • What are our next steps? Do we have the correct problem identified? Did we find the most important reasons?
 

Updated June 10, 2008 | Maintained by Webmaster


© 1995–2004 Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland